Not as aggressive as adaptive but I honestly think these strategies are more for entertainment purposes. You can’t trade a smaller quantity after a loss. This will make wins smaller. And some of the stops I have seen been adjusted next day to a wider stop indicating strategy bagholds until has some lucky results.
I know basically most money/ followers on C2 are using this system currently, but I am actually not so sure about this one. Right when I was gaining a lot of interest due to a win streak in the first few months this year, I watched a few trades to see a losing streak. I don't think betting all the capital and inconsistent sizing after a loss helps this system. It should be betting up to about half the account and leave the rest cash in case there's a long enough drawdown period. The system mathematically is likely set for failure when theirs a long enough losing streak due to the over aggressive sizing of usually whole account on every trade and the wide stops.
Strategy is very good and Ernie is very responsive with all queries and clarifications. The only unfortunate thing is that US ETFs are not supported from Europe. Apart from that everything is good. Consistent profits and strict stop losses. Didn't observe many losses so far in my experience
The win rate for the strategy is high because it uses Martingale. The strategy doesn’t use stop loss and can blow up an account. It’s only a question of when if you have a small account.
In my more than 15 years on C2, I’ve seen many solid strategies, but options-based strategies- especially those using vertical spreads - often follow the same pattern: long winning streaks followed by infrequent but much larger losses. I initially thought this strategy might be different given the developer’s knowledge, discipline, and well planning, but in the end it feels like déjà vu, similar outcome to other options strategies I’ve seen on C2
It's always nice to collect the premium from a credit spread but they are not without great risk. They are directional so if strategy gets the direction wrong then it can go very wrong because of the number of contracts used. Strategy description says risk is capped but doesn't say to what percentage or amount. Doesn't seem to have a limit
This strategy makes best of use of volatility by predicting which direction it will go next really well. Though all their predictions don't end up right, their gains offset the minor losses from wrong predictions. In my belief, predictive strategies will always outperform reactive strategies, so i am quite interested in this! As a strategy manager myself, quite impressed with the work they have done.
Initially the strategy was good. Later on I guess the manager took a break and didn't anything for almost a year and mails which were sent daily became weekly and later once in a fortnight.
Never given 5 stars before but this system deserves it.
The higher subscription cost is a big increase but returns to date have been outstanding and warrant the extra expenditure.
Stay away from it. He will blow the account sooner or later. No risk control at all, he just hopes for the run to continue forever. No logic in his entries or exits, so no strategy at all in reality.
Strategy direction seems perfect. I subscribed since mid Nov 2025. Price increased from 185 USD/month to 495 USD/month. Such a massive price rise is not justified. It is noted that stop loss is placed at the opening of market and it hits/executed most of the time and booked the loss. but after one hour it reversed and price goes up. If stop loss order placed after 1 hour of market open then profit erosion can be prevented.